Recently, I saw someone delegating governance votes to "familiar KOLs," saying it’s more convenient... I understand, with a bunch of tokens in the wallet, who has time to read proposals every day? But after delegating for a long time, it feels strange: tokens are scattered, but votes are becoming more concentrated, eventually it’s like a few addresses are "replacing everyone’s agreement." Who exactly is governance token governing? Honestly, it might have first governed ordinary people: if you don’t vote, you implicitly let others vote; if you’re lazy, you hand over the steering wheel.

Modularization and the DA layer development team are quite excited, and it’s normal for users to be confused. In the end, the complexity makes it easier for "I don’t understand, you choose for me." My biggest fear isn’t losing money, but losing control—if the money is lost, you can review it; once the power is handed over, it’s very hard to get back. Anyway, I now delegate by choosing two or three different approaches, and occasionally vote manually myself, at least knowing which way the car is turning.