BlockBeats News, February 13 — The People’s Court of Jing’an District, Shanghai, China, recently heard a case involving an improper profit-taking dispute caused by virtual currency investment. Ms. Wu was persuaded by a live stream host to invest 1.05 million yuan in virtual currency trading. After being unable to withdraw funds from the platform, she filed a lawsuit seeking compensation. However, her claims were dismissed in both the first and second trials, and she was ultimately responsible for bearing all losses herself. This final judgment serves as a warning to all investors who indulge in wishful thinking and blindly engage in virtual currency speculation.
In November 2019, Ms. Wu received a sales call and, under the guidance of a live stream investment host, downloaded a virtual currency trading app. Through this platform, Ms. Wu made successive investments totaling 1.05 million yuan, reaching agreements with eight sellers, including a transaction of 80,000 yuan with Mr. He. Later, Ms. Wu discovered that she could not log into the trading app, and the virtual currency worth 1.05 million yuan in her account on the platform could not be withdrawn.
In 2024, Ms. Wu reported the incident to the local public security authorities and filed a civil lawsuit in court, claiming that Mr. He should return the 80,000 yuan transaction amount on the grounds of improper profit. Mr. He argued that he was a member of a certain digital trading platform, was selling USDT digital currency through order placement, had not registered an account on the platform Ms. Wu referred to, and that the transaction was completed after the funds were received, so there was no improper profit.
After review, the Shanghai Jing’an District People’s Court held that, according to the relevant provisions of the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China, civil subjects engaging in civil activities must not violate laws or violate public order and good morals. In this case, the USDT involved is a virtual currency, which does not have the same legal status as legal tender. Activities related to virtual currency are considered illegal financial activities. Ms. Wu’s investment transactions involve virtual currency-related business activities, and trading virtual currency disrupts the national financial regulatory order, violating public order and good morals, and constitutes an invalid civil legal act. The losses arising from this should be borne by her alone. In conclusion, the Jing’an District People’s Court dismissed all claims filed by plaintiff Ms. Wu. Dissatisfied with the judgment, Ms. Wu appealed. After review, the second-instance court dismissed the appeal and upheld the original ruling.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Stablecoin funds flow exposed in ISIS case: Indonesian court’s on-chain evidence could convict for terrorist financing
An Indonesian court ruled on three individuals suspected of financing terrorism, with on-chain cryptocurrency transactions serving as the core evidence, revealing that they used cryptocurrencies to move funds to activities related to ISIS. Investigations show that improvements in cryptocurrency regulatory capabilities and heightened monitoring across Southeast Asia mean the flow of terrorist funds is facing strict scrutiny.
GateNews17m ago
Strengthen the bank–tax interaction! China encourages banks to use blockchain, but people trading coins and tokenizing everything is all illegal.
The Chinese government encourages banks to use blockchain technology to strengthen “bank–tax interactions,” improve the financing environment for small and medium-sized enterprises, and at the same time fully ban private cryptocurrency trading and mining, treating stablecoins and tokenization as illegal activities. This sets a clear policy boundary and emphasizes official supervision and financial security.
CryptoCity25m ago
Drift Hacker Case: How a North Korean Hacker Infiltrated for 6 Months and Planned the Largest DeFi Heist of Spring 2026
Drift Protocol was breached by North Korean hackers on April Fool's Day, resulting in the theft of approximately $280 million in assets. The hackers used social engineering and vulnerabilities in development tools, then after a long period of stealth, successfully obtained administrative privileges and executed withdrawals. The incident sparked widespread discussion and legal criticism of DeFi security, with critics arguing that the development team had civil negligence, and calling for stronger security precautions.
CryptoCity39m ago
SEC Moves First: Independent Crypto Fundraising Rules Are Set to Take Effect, the CLARITY Act Faces an Escalation of the Standoff
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is accelerating the development of a cryptocurrency regulatory framework, proposing a “safe harbor” mechanism to provide compliant financing pathways for crypto startups. Compared with Congress’s “CLARITY Act,” the SEC’s standalone rule set establishes higher financing limits and disclosure standards while also advancing a “tokenization innovation exemption.” Currently, crypto policy is becoming clearer step by step, and the SEC-led rules will be prioritized in shaping the market.
GateNews44m ago
First time posting crypto content—verify! X rolls out new anti-scam rules to stop hackers from stealing accounts and promoting spam coins
Community platform X has introduced a mandatory verification mechanism for cryptocurrency-related content to address increasingly severe scam problems. The mechanism will lock an account the first time it mentions cryptocurrency, requiring users to complete identity verification. According to data, in 2025 cryptocurrency scams are expected to reach $17 billion, and social platforms have become an important source of scams. The new measures aim to reduce the success rate of scams that use highly trusted accounts, but scam activity is still rapidly expanding, and prevention measures face challenges.
CryptoCity49m ago
Japan’s Prime Minister embroiled in a Meme coin controversy: SANAE TOKEN surges 40x then crashes, and a major regulatory crackdown is about to land
The Japan SANAE TOKEN incident sparked a political stir, as token promotion involving Prime Minister Sanae Takaiti drew controversy. The market reaction was intense: after the token price surged dramatically, it then fell sharply. Japan’s Financial Services Agency has launched an investigation; regulatory scrutiny will be strengthened, signaling that compliance requirements in the crypto market will rise.
GateNews1h ago
