PANews February 17 News, F2Pool co-founder Wang Chun posted on X platform that quantum computing is more like a technological bubble compared to AI. The industry is currently filled with hype but has almost no actual deliverables. AI is continuously improving the real world, while quantum computing is unlikely to achieve practical applications by 2026, and is expected to remain difficult to generate substantial industry value for decades to come. His trading view is to short quantum computing but to remain long Bitcoin. He also specifically mentioned bearish views on several quantum computing concept stocks, including Rigetti Computing ($RGTI), D-Wave Quantum ($QBTS), Quantum Computing Inc. ($QUBT), and IonQ ($IONQ). Wang Chun added that the current products and commercialization capabilities of these companies are insufficient, and market valuation is more based on long-term technological expectations.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
SpaceX holds approximately $603 million worth of Bitcoin, and in the same period recorded nearly $5 billion in losses due to integrating xAI.
Gate News update: April 12. SpaceX currently holds Bitcoin worth about $603 million. In the same period, the company recorded a nearly $5 billion loss due to integrating xAI. Despite the large loss, SpaceX’s Bitcoin holdings have remained unchanged since mid-2024, with no signs of selling.
GateNews5m ago
The New York Times reignites the “Satoshi identity mystery”—Adam Back quickly clears things up after being targeted
Author: Nancy, PANews
Satoshi Nakamoto’s real identity remains the mystery that has persisted for 17 years in the crypto world. Speculation about this pseudonym has never stopped—candidates have ranged from cryptographers to corporate founders—but there has always been a lack of evidence to definitively settle the matter.
Recently, The New York Times published a multi-thousand-word investigation that, based on multiple comparisons drawn from linguistic style, technical pathways, and historical context, listed Blockstream CEO Adam Back as the strongest candidate for Satoshi Nakamoto. However, the claim was quickly and clearly denied by Back himself, and the relevant arguments were widely questioned by the industry as difficult to substantiate.
Satoshi Nakamoto identity controversy flares up again, with the investigation targeting Adam Back
In this investigation, The New York Times reporter John Carreyrou spent more than a year and a half deeply sorting through archives spanning decades, as well as the cryptographic punk email list, to
区块客1h ago
BTC 15-minute drop of 0.45%: Aggressive sell-side orders lead, layered with weakening liquidity at the margin, amplifying volatility
2026-04-11 23:00 to 2026-04-11 23:15（UTC）, BTC’s return over 15 minutes was -0.45%, and the price fluctuated within the range of 72907.4 to 73370.7 USDT, with a swing amplitude of 0.63%. During this period, market activity remains at a high level, but the price anomaly has drawn investors’ short-term attention. Overall trading sentiment is slightly cautious, and volatility is marginally higher than usual.
The main driver behind this anomaly is that active sell orders have a slight advantage, causing a short-term downward adjustment in price. Combined with a modest increase in trading volume for major trading pairs and spot
GateNews1h ago
