Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Just read something interesting about California's wealth tax proposal and it really got me thinking about how unrealistic some of these populist policies actually are.
So there's this budget analyst from Wharton, Kent Smetters, who basically broke down why making it unlawful to be a billionaire through asset taxes doesn't work the way people imagine. Here's the kicker—if the government literally confiscated everything above $999 million from every billionaire in America, it would only cover federal spending for 7-8 months. That's it. Most people have no idea the actual wealth pool is that small.
And it's not just theory. Smetters points out that Austria, Denmark, Germany, and France all tried wealth taxes and abandoned them because they generated way less revenue than projected. As of mid-2024, only four OECD countries still have wealth taxes, and the U.S. has none. The ones that did exist collected less than 0.3% of GDP with crazy high admin costs and valuation nightmares.
What's wild is how people who want to become a billionaire or understand wealth creation often miss this context. The tax base is fundamentally limited. You can't squeeze blood from a stone, and that's essentially what these proposals are trying to do.
Smetters describes the current push as a "perfect storm"—AI anxiety, social media amplifying fears, a few mega-cap companies dominating the S&P 500, and what economists call "money illusion" where people feel poorer despite higher living standards. It's real psychology at work, not just economics.
His take? Instead of chasing billionaires' assets, California should broaden its tax base—think VAT or comprehensive sales tax. More stable, less volatile, fewer valuation headaches. But that requires actual structural reform, not populist theater.
The U.S. already has the most progressive tax system among developed nations—the wealthy pay a disproportionate share. The real issue is we collect less total revenue than comparable countries. It's a structural problem that can't be fixed by targeting the ultra-wealthy alone.
Interesting how this ties into broader economic anxiety. People see billionaires getting richer and assume that's the root cause of their problems, but the mechanics of tax policy are way more nuanced. Worth understanding if you're serious about how wealth actually works in this economy.