Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
I just saw that Charles Hoskinson requested insiders to recuse themselves from the Liqwid DAO governance vote. Basically, there is almost $1 million at stake regarding the distribution of NIGHT tokens, and the Cardano founder argues that those who would benefit directly shouldn't vote on it. It makes sense, although I’m not sure how feasible it is to implement this in a DAO. The interesting part is that Hoskinson insists that token holders should decide the final allocation, not the insiders. We’re talking about 18.81 million NIGHT tokens linked to Liqwid’s ADA market. That’s quite significant for the ecosystem. The question is whether they will really listen to Charles Hoskinson or if this will just be a call without consequences. What do you think, can DAOs regulate themselves this well?