MeaninglessGwei

Burry of The Big Short said the biggest source of demand in the US stock market is disappearing.
US stock net issuance has turned positive again for the first time since 2021. This means the number of shares companies are currently putting into the market through issuing new stock has already exceeded the number of shares that have been bought back and retired.
For most of the past 20 years, share buybacks have been quietly reducing the total supply of shares in the market. Even if corporate profits have not grown in step, the contraction in stock supply itself provides support for stock price

Judging from the technical charts, since last Tuesday’s three-day pullback was too deep, if I were to say that SNDK now has a head-and-shoulders top, I can’t really be refuted.
That’s why you need to be wary of SNDK continuing to fall next week to around 1,700.
Without a long-term position, you definitely won’t be able to hold. If it drops again to 1,500 or even 1,200, short-term beginners will absolutely be scared to death.
Getting hit and getting stopped out and liquidated is normal. Since it’s gambling, then accept the outcome—don’t keep blaming others on the internet every day. And I don’t

Judging from the technical chart pattern, since last Tuesday’s three-day pullback was too deep, if I say SNDK is now forming a head-and-shoulders top, I really can’t be refuted.
That’s why you need to keep watching: there’s a reason to be on alert for SNDK to fall back toward around 1,700 again next week.
If you don’t have long-term positions, you definitely can’t hold it. If it drops again to 1,500, it will definitely scare you.
Only leveraged short-term traders—if you’ve cleared your position and stopped out, then don’t come back and blame others.
Since it’s gambling, you should accept the o

From the technical chart perspective, since the three-day pullback as of last Tuesday fell too deeply, you can say that SNDK is now forming a head-and-shoulders top, and I believe any bulls can’t fully refute that.
That’s why you need to watch out for SNDK potentially dropping again near 1,700 next week.
Thank you, everyone.

Many people worry that storage will turn out like the fiber optics of 2000—because of excessive infrastructure buildout and overcapacity, leading to blowups. But I think storage and fiber optics still have a few fundamental differences at the physical layer:
1) The “linearity” of Maxwell’s equations means optical paths can be multiplexed across many frequencies and won’t interfere with each other; therefore, in theory, the bandwidth of a single optical fiber can be infinitely large.
2) Even at nearby frequencies, fiber optics can further multiply communication efficiency using purely mathemati

Many people worry that storage will end up like the fiber optics of 2000—because overbuilding leads to excess capacity, and ultimately something breaks. But I think storage and fiber optics still differ in a few fundamental physical aspects:
1) The “linearity” of Maxwell’s equations means that a single optical path can be reused across multiple frequencies without interference; therefore, the bandwidth of a single fiber can be effectively infinite.
2) Even if you use the same frequency, the fiber can still improve communication efficiency through purely mathematical methods like modulation and

Many people are worried that storage will end up like the fiber optics of 2000, because excessive infrastructure building leads to eventual blowups. But I think storage and fiber optics still have several fundamental physical differences:
1) The “linearity” of Maxwell’s equations means that one optical path can be reused across multiple frequencies without interfering; therefore, the bandwidth of a single fiber can be infinitely large.
2) Even if the same frequency is used, fiber optics can still improve communication efficiency through purely mathematical methods like modulation and coding.
B