SEC Chair Atkins Calls for New Rulemaking on Onchain Market Structures

CryptoFrontier
HYPE-6.73%

SEC Chair Paul Atkins stated on Friday at an artificial intelligence expo hosted by the Special Competitive Studies Project that the Securities and Exchange Commission needs to clarify how its regulatory framework applies to software applications as it considers future rules for onchain financial markets. Atkins noted that software applications do not fit neatly into the SEC’s existing regulatory categories such as clearing agency, broker, or exchange.

Regulatory Framework Gaps

Atkins highlighted the complexity of onchain systems, stating: “A single protocol can execute a trade, manage collateral, route liquidity, execute trading strategies through vault structures, and settle the transaction—all within a unified, automated system, often within seconds.”

He emphasized that onchain market structures are often hybrid in nature, combining elements of traditional and decentralized finance, requiring the SEC to clarify how its statutes apply across the spectrum of these models.

Proposed Rulemaking and Clarifications

Atkins called for the SEC to pursue notice-and-comment rulemaking to revisit definitions related to exchange, clearing agency, and broker definitions as they apply to onchain trading systems. He also called for more clarity around crypto vaults—onchain software applications that allow users to earn yield passively.

Atkins stated: “We should clarify how the Commission views the spectrum of models that may implicate our statutes through notice and comment rulemaking, using our exemptive authorities where necessary and prudent, all with full participation from innovators, investors, and the public alike.”

Recent SEC Staff Action

Last month, the SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets released a staff statement delineating that interfaces, such as DeFi wallets, would generally not be considered brokers.

SEC’s Shifting Crypto Stance

Atkins’ remarks underscore the SEC’s increasingly crypto-friendly posture compared with former Chair Gary Gensler, who took a more cautious approach to digital assets and argued that most cryptocurrencies fell under the agency’s jurisdiction. Since taking office, Atkins has floated the idea of an innovation exemption for tokenized securities and overseen the release of a taxonomy aimed at clarifying which digital assets may qualify as securities.

Industry Response

Industry groups praised the remarks. The DeFi Education Fund described Atkins’ comments as “powerful,” while the Hyperliquid Policy Center said it was encouraged to see “a Chairman willing to map these systems to existing legal frameworks on their own terms, rather than force them into legacy categories built for legacy architecture.”

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.
Comment
0/400
RecedingTideAfterTheRainvip
· 05-11 04:05
Where exactly are the boundaries of on-chain finance? Do oracles and MEV bots count? Waiting for a clear testing standard.
View OriginalReply0
Paper-SculptedOctopusPoolvip
· 05-10 04:15
Paul Atkins is much more moderate than Gary Gensler, but moderation doesn't mean not working; let's see how it is implemented later.
View OriginalReply0
0xLateBreakfastvip
· 05-09 06:00
The definition of software applications has expanded; wallets, bridges, and even smart contract front-ends could be included, which is quite alarming upon closer reflection.
View OriginalReply0
TheStoneBehindTheVolcanovip
· 05-09 05:58
AI Expo talks about on-chain finance—this combo is pretty much “time-traveling,” and the regulatory approach still seems to be stuck in the Web2 era.
View OriginalReply0
OrderbookOttervip
· 05-09 05:53
Is Atkins finally starting to take the issue of code as law seriously?
View OriginalReply0
ContractsMustNotLie.vip
· 05-09 05:49
If the SEC could regulate DeFi protocols and TradFi using the same logic, how much compliance cost could the industry save? But probably it's not that simple.
View OriginalReply0